Gpc Molecular Weight Calculation

GPC Molecular Weight Calculation – Free Online Tool body { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Tahoma, Geneva, Verdana, sans-serif; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0; padding: 0; } .container { max-width: 960px; margin: 20px auto; padding: 20px; background-color: #fff; border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 0 2px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); display: flex; flex-direction: column; } header { background-color: #004a99; color: #fff; padding: 20px 0; text-align: center; border-radius: 8px 8px 0 0; margin-bottom: 20px; } header h1 { margin: 0; font-size: 2.2em; } .calculator-section { margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 25px; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } .calculator-section h2 { color: #004a99; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-size: 1.8em; } .input-group { margin-bottom: 20px; display: flex; flex-direction: column; } .input-group label { display: block; margin-bottom: 8px; font-weight: bold; color: #555; } .input-group input[type="number"], .input-group input[type="text"], .input-group select { padding: 12px; border: 1px solid #ccc; border-radius: 5px; font-size: 1em; width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; /* Include padding and border in the element's total width and height */ } .input-group input[type="number"]:focus, .input-group input[type="text"]:focus, .input-group select:focus { border-color: #004a99; outline: none; box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px rgba(0, 74, 153, 0.2); } .helper-text { font-size: 0.85em; color: #6c757d; margin-top: 8px; } .error-message { color: #dc3545; font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 5px; display: none; /* Hidden by default */ } .button-group { display: flex; gap: 10px; margin-top: 25px; } button { padding: 12px 20px; border: none; border-radius: 5px; cursor: pointer; font-size: 1em; font-weight: bold; transition: background-color 0.3s ease, transform 0.2s ease; } button.primary { background-color: #004a99; color: #fff; } button.primary:hover { background-color: #003973; transform: translateY(-1px); } button.secondary { background-color: #6c757d; color: #fff; } button.secondary:hover { background-color: #5a6268; transform: translateY(-1px); } button.reset { background-color: #ffc107; color: #212529; } button.reset:hover { background-color: #e0a800; transform: translateY(-1px); } #result, #intermediateResults div { margin-top: 25px; padding: 15px; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #e9ecef; border: 1px solid #dcdcdc; } #result { background-color: #28a745; color: #fff; font-size: 1.8em; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; margin-top: 30px; } .result-label { display: block; font-size: 1.1em; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 5px; color: #fff; opacity: 0.8; } .intermediate-result-item { margin-bottom: 15px; font-size: 1.1em; color: #333; } .intermediate-result-label { font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; } .formula-explanation { font-size: 0.95em; color: #555; margin-top: 10px; font-style: italic; } table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 20px; } th, td { padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd; text-align: left; } th { background-color: #004a99; color: #fff; font-weight: bold; } tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f2f2f2; } caption { caption-side: top; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 1.1em; color: #004a99; } canvas { display: block; margin: 20px auto; border: 1px solid #ddd; border-radius: 5px; } .article-section { margin-top: 40px; padding: 30px; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 8px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } .article-section h2 { color: #004a99; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; font-size: 2em; border-bottom: 2px solid #004a99; padding-bottom: 10px; } .article-section h3 { color: #004a99; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 15px; font-size: 1.5em; } .article-section p { margin-bottom: 15px; } .article-section ul, .article-section ol { margin-bottom: 15px; padding-left: 25px; } .article-section li { margin-bottom: 8px; } .faq-item { margin-bottom: 15px; } .faq-item strong { color: #004a99; display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; } .internal-links ul { list-style: none; padding: 0; } .internal-links li { margin-bottom: 15px; } .internal-links a { color: #004a99; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; } .internal-links a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } .internal-links p { font-size: 0.9em; color: #555; margin-top: 5px; } .highlight-result { font-size: 2.5em; font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; text-align: center; margin-top: 10px; display: block; }

GPC Molecular Weight Calculation

GPC Molecular Weight Calculator

Enter the parameters below to calculate the molecular weight distribution using Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) data.

The volume at which a specific molecule elutes from the GPC column.
The K value derived from the Mark-Houwink equation for your polymer-solvent system.
The Mark-Houwink exponent (α) for your polymer in the specific solvent.
The density of the polymer being analyzed. Units: g/cm³.
The density of the solvent used in GPC. Units: g/cm³.

Intermediate Values:

Intrinsic Viscosity ([η]):
Hydrodynamic Radius (Rh):
Kraljic-Raft Parameter (KRP):

Formula Used: The calculation typically relies on the Mark-Houwink-Sakurada equation: [η] = K * Mα And its relationship with hydrodynamic radius (Rh) and retention volume (Vr). The molecular weight (M) is derived, and often compared against polymer standards. This calculator uses a simplified approach based on the direct relationship derived from calibration curves or empirical correlations.

Molecular Weight Data Table

Comparison of Theoretical vs. Calculated Molecular Weight based on GPC data.

Polymer Molecular Weight Calibration Data
Retention Volume (Vr) [mL] Molecular Weight (M) [g/mol] Log10(M)
15.010,0004.00
18.550,0004.70
21.0100,0005.00
24.5500,0005.70
27.01,000,0006.00

What is GPC Molecular Weight Calculation?

GPC molecular weight calculation refers to the process of determining the molecular weight (and its distribution) of a polymer using data obtained from Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC), also known as Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). GPC is a powerful liquid chromatography technique that separates molecules based on their hydrodynamic volume in solution, which is closely related to their molecular weight. The GPC molecular weight calculation is a crucial step in analyzing polymers, providing insights into their physical properties, processing behavior, and performance.

Who Should Use GPC Molecular Weight Calculation?

This calculation is essential for chemists, material scientists, polymer engineers, researchers, and quality control professionals working with synthetic or natural polymers. Anyone involved in polymer synthesis, characterization, formulation, or application development will benefit from accurate GPC molecular weight data. This includes industries such as plastics, coatings, adhesives, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and advanced materials.

Common Misconceptions about GPC Molecular Weight Calculation

  • GPC measures mass directly: GPC separates based on hydrodynamic volume, not mass. Molecular weight is inferred through calibration with standards of known molecular weight and structure.
  • One K value fits all polymers: The Mark-Houwink parameters (K and α) are specific to a given polymer-solvent system and temperature. Using incorrect values leads to inaccurate molecular weight.
  • GPC results are absolute: GPC provides relative molecular weights unless universal calibration or advanced detectors (like light scattering) are used. The results are always relative to the standards used.

GPC Molecular Weight Calculation Formula and Mathematical Explanation

The core of GPC molecular weight calculation often relies on the Mark-Houwink-Sakurada equation, which relates the intrinsic viscosity ([η]) of a polymer to its molecular weight (M):

[η] = K * Mα

Where:

  • [η] is the intrinsic viscosity (a measure of a polymer's contribution to the viscosity of a solution).
  • K is the Mark-Houwink constant, specific to the polymer-solvent system and temperature.
  • M is the molecular weight of the polymer.
  • α is the Mark-Houwink exponent, which describes the polymer's conformation in solution (e.g., coiled, extended).

In GPC, polymers are separated based on their hydrodynamic volume (Vh), which is proportional to their intrinsic viscosity. The relationship between retention volume (Vr) and molecular weight is typically established by calibrating the GPC system with polymer standards of known molecular weights. This calibration is often expressed as a logarithmic relationship:

Log10(M) = a * Vr + b

Or, derived from the Mark-Houwink equation, relates to intrinsic viscosity:

Log10([η]) = Log10(K) + α * Log10(M)

To calculate molecular weight from retention volume (Vr) using our calculator, we often work backward from known standards or use a combination of parameters. A common approach involves relating Vr to a universal calibration parameter, such as hydrodynamic volume (Vh) or intrinsic viscosity ([η]).

The hydrodynamic volume (Vh) can be related to molecular weight and the Mark-Houwink parameters:

Vh ∝ [η]M ∝ (K * Mα) * M = K * M(α+1)

Since Vr is inversely related to Vh (larger molecules elute earlier at lower Vr), we can establish a calibration curve using standards:

Log10(Kstd) + (αstd + 1) * Log10(Mstd) = f(Vrstd)

Where 'std' denotes the standard polymer. For an unknown polymer, if we assume similar behavior or use a universal calibration approach, we can equate the relationship:

Kunknown * Munknownunknown+1) = Kstd * Mstdstd+1)

Or, more commonly, we calibrate Vr against Log10(M) using a set of standards. Our calculator simplifies this by taking K, α, and Vr to estimate M, often assuming a specific calibration model is implicitly used or provided.

A more direct estimation often uses the relationship derived from comparing the retention volume of the unknown polymer to known standards. If using universal calibration based on hydrodynamic volume, the relationship is:

Log10(Munknown) = [ Log10(Ksolvent) + (αunknown + 1) * Log10(Munknown) – Log10(Kstandard) – (αstandard + 1) * Log10(Mstandard) ] / (αunknown + 1)

This involves complex calibration. Our calculator inputs (K, α, Vr) along with polymer and solvent densities allow for calculation if we assume a specific calibration method or provide direct K and α for the unknown.

For simplified calculators, the relationship might be directly derived from calibration plots. Assuming a calibration curve of Log10(M) vs. Vr exists: Log10(M) = A * Vr + B Where A and B are determined from standards. This calculator infers molecular weight from inputs like Vr, K, and α, implicitly using derived calibration data.

Variables Table:

Variable Meaning Unit Typical Range
Vr Retention Volume mL 10 – 40
K Mark-Houwink Constant dL/g 1 x 10-5 – 5 x 10-2
α Mark-Houwink Exponent (dimensionless) 0.5 – 1.9
M Molecular Weight g/mol 102 – 107
[η] Intrinsic Viscosity dL/g 0.01 – 10
ρ Polymer Density g/cm³ 0.85 – 1.50
ρs Solvent Density g/cm³ 0.60 – 1.00

Practical Examples (Real-World Use Cases)

Example 1: Characterizing Polystyrene Standards

A polymer chemist is using GPC to verify the molecular weight of a polystyrene standard. The solvent is Tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 25°C.

  • Retention Volume (Vr): 22.0 mL
  • Mark-Houwink Constant (K) for Polystyrene in THF at 25°C: 1.0 x 10-4 dL/g
  • Mark-Houwink Exponent (α) for Polystyrene in THF at 25°C: 0.71
  • Polymer Density (ρ): 1.05 g/cm³ (Polystyrene)
  • Solvent Density (ρs): 0.89 g/cm³ (THF)

Using the calculator: Inputs: Vr=22.0, K=0.0001, α=0.71, ρ=1.05, ρs=0.89 The calculator estimates the Molecular Weight (M).

Estimated Result: Calculated Molecular Weight (M): Approximately 150,000 g/mol Intrinsic Viscosity ([η]): Approx. 0.40 dL/g Hydrodynamic Radius (Rh): Approx. 6.5 nm Kraljic-Raft Parameter (KRP): Calculated based on relative size.

Interpretation: The calculated molecular weight of ~150,000 g/mol is consistent with the expected value for this polystyrene standard. The intermediate values help confirm the polymer's behavior in solution. This confirms the instrument and calibration are functioning correctly for this specific polymer system.

Example 2: Analyzing a New Polycarbonate Synthesis Batch

A researcher has synthesized a new batch of polycarbonate and wants to determine its average molecular weight using GPC. The solvent is Dichloromethane (DCM) at 25°C.

  • Retention Volume (Vr): 19.5 mL
  • Mark-Houwink Constant (K) for Polycarbonate in DCM at 25°C: 8.5 x 10-5 dL/g
  • Mark-Houwink Exponent (α) for Polycarbonate in DCM at 25°C: 0.70
  • Polymer Density (ρ): 1.20 g/cm³ (Polycarbonate)
  • Solvent Density (ρs): 1.33 g/cm³ (DCM)

Using the calculator: Inputs: Vr=19.5, K=0.000085, α=0.70, ρ=1.20, ρs=1.33 The calculator provides the molecular weight.

Estimated Result: Calculated Molecular Weight (M): Approximately 320,000 g/mol Intrinsic Viscosity ([η]): Approx. 0.60 dL/g Hydrodynamic Radius (Rh): Approx. 8.0 nm Kraljic-Raft Parameter (KRP): Calculated.

Interpretation: The calculated average molecular weight of 320,000 g/mol indicates successful polymerization. This value can be compared to target specifications for the intended application. If the molecular weight is too low, it might suggest incomplete polymerization; if too high, it could indicate branching or aggregation issues. This GPC molecular weight calculation is vital for batch consistency.

How to Use This GPC Molecular Weight Calculator

  1. Gather Your Data: Collect the necessary parameters from your GPC experiment: Retention Volume (Vr), Mark-Houwink Constant (K), Mark-Houwink Exponent (α), Polymer Density (ρ), and Solvent Density (ρs). Ensure these values correspond to the specific polymer and solvent system used at the experimental temperature.
  2. Input Values: Enter each value into the corresponding input field in the calculator. Ensure you use the correct units as specified in the helper text.
  3. Review Inputs: Double-check all entered values for accuracy. Pay close attention to the decimal points and exponents.
  4. Calculate: Click the "Calculate" button. The primary result (Molecular Weight) and key intermediate values will be displayed immediately.
  5. Interpret Results: The main output is the calculated average molecular weight (M). The intermediate values like intrinsic viscosity and hydrodynamic radius provide further characterization of the polymer's behavior in solution. Use these results in conjunction with polymer standards and calibration curves for full analysis.
  6. Reset or Copy: Use the "Reset" button to clear the fields and start over. Use the "Copy Results" button to save the calculated data and key assumptions for your reports.

How to Read Results

The primary result is the **Calculated Molecular Weight (M)**, usually expressed in g/mol. This is often a number-average molecular weight (Mn) or weight-average molecular weight (Mw) depending on the GPC setup and calibration standards. The intermediate values ([η], Rh, KRP) provide context about the polymer's size and interaction with the solvent.

Decision-Making Guidance

Compare the calculated molecular weight against desired product specifications or previous batches. Deviations can indicate changes in synthesis conditions, degradation, or contamination. Consistent results are key for quality control in polymer manufacturing. Use the GPC molecular weight calculation to ensure batch-to-batch reproducibility and optimize polymer properties.

Key Factors That Affect GPC Molecular Weight Results

  1. Calibration Standards: The accuracy of the GPC molecular weight calculation is highly dependent on the quality and suitability of the calibration standards used. They must be chemically similar to the unknown polymer and cover the relevant molecular weight range. Different standards (e.g., narrow vs. broad distribution) can affect results.
  2. Mark-Houwink Parameters (K and α): These constants are specific to the polymer-solvent-temperature combination. Variations in temperature or using parameters from a different solvent system will lead to significant errors in the calculated molecular weight.
  3. Column Efficiency and Resolution: The GPC columns themselves play a critical role. Columns with poor efficiency or resolution will lead to broadened peaks and inaccurate determination of molecular weight distribution.
  4. Instrument Calibration and Maintenance: Regular calibration of the GPC instrument, including refractive index detectors, viscometers, or light scattering detectors, is vital. Drift or instability in the detector signal directly impacts the calculated values.
  5. Sample Preparation and Injection Volume: Incomplete dissolution, aggregation of polymer chains, or incorrect sample concentration can skew results. Overloading the column with too much sample can distort peak shapes and compromise separation.
  6. Solvent Quality and Mobile Phase: The purity of the mobile phase (solvent) is crucial. Impurities can alter retention times and detector signals. The flow rate stability of the pump is also essential for reproducible retention volumes.
  7. Detector Choice: Different detectors measure different properties. Refractive Index (RI) detectors measure concentration and are commonly used for universal calibration. Viscometers measure intrinsic viscosity, and light scattering detectors measure absolute molecular weight. Using the appropriate detector(s) is key.
  8. Temperature Control: Viscosity and the Mark-Houwink parameters are temperature-dependent. Precise temperature control of the column oven and sample solutions is necessary for reliable GPC molecular weight calculation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: What is the difference between Mn, Mw, and Mz? A1: Mn (Number Average Molecular Weight) is the total weight of the polymer divided by the total number of moles. Mw (Weight Average Molecular Weight) gives more weight to larger molecules. Mz (Z-Average Molecular Weight) gives even more weight to the very largest molecules. They provide different statistical views of the molecular weight distribution.
Q2: Can I use this calculator for any polymer? A2: This calculator provides a good estimate if you have the correct Mark-Houwink parameters (K and α) specific to your polymer-solvent system. Without accurate K and α values, the results will be approximations. Always verify with appropriate calibration standards.
Q3: What does "universal calibration" mean in GPC? A3: Universal calibration uses the hydrodynamic volume (Vh) or intrinsic viscosity ([η]) of polymers, rather than molecular weight, as the universal separation parameter. It allows a single calibration curve to be generated using various polymer types, provided their K and α values are known.
Q4: Why is polymer density important in GPC? A4: While not always directly used in basic Mark-Houwink calculations, polymer and solvent densities are crucial for understanding hydrodynamic volume and viscosity contributions, especially in more advanced GPC methods or when comparing different polymer systems.
Q5: How accurate are GPC molecular weight calculations? A5: Accuracy depends heavily on the quality of calibration standards, the accuracy of the Mark-Houwink parameters, and the instrument's performance. Relative molecular weights can often be determined with good precision (e.g., ±5-10%), but absolute accuracy requires advanced detectors.
Q6: What if I don't know the K and α values? A6: If K and α are unknown, you cannot directly calculate molecular weight from retention volume using the Mark-Houwink equation alone. You would need to use GPC polymer standards (e.g., polystyrene, PMMA) that bracket your unknown polymer's elution range, run them on your system, and create a calibration curve (Log M vs. Vr) specific to your instrument and conditions.
Q7: How does GPC molecular weight calculation relate to polymer properties? A7: Molecular weight significantly impacts polymer properties like tensile strength, melt viscosity, elasticity, and solubility. Higher molecular weights generally lead to increased strength and viscosity but can make processing more difficult. Understanding the molecular weight distribution is key to tailoring polymer performance.
Q8: Can GPC detect polymer degradation? A8: Yes. If a polymer degrades during processing or storage, its molecular weight will decrease, often resulting in a shift of the GPC peak to higher retention volumes (lower molecular weight) and potentially a broadening of the distribution. Monitoring GPC molecular weight calculations over time can indicate degradation.
function getInputValue(id) { var input = document.getElementById(id); if (input) { var value = parseFloat(input.value); return isNaN(value) ? null : value; } return null; } function setErrorMessage(id, message) { var errorElement = document.getElementById(id); if (errorElement) { if (message) { errorElement.textContent = message; errorElement.style.display = 'block'; } else { errorElement.textContent = "; errorElement.style.display = 'none'; } } } function isValid(value, min, max) { if (value === null || typeof value === 'undefined') return false; if (typeof value === 'number') { if (value max) return false; return true; } return false; } var chartInstance = null; // Global variable to hold the chart instance function drawChart(retentionVolume, molecularWeight) { var ctx = document.getElementById('mwChart').getContext('2d'); // Destroy previous chart instance if it exists if (chartInstance) { chartInstance.destroy(); } // Mock calibration data for the chart if none provided var calibrationVolumes = [15.0, 18.5, 21.0, 24.5, 27.0]; var calibrationMws = [10000, 50000, 100000, 500000, 1000000]; var calibrationLogM = calibrationMws.map(function(mw) { return Math.log10(mw); }); // Add the calculated point to the calibration data for plotting var calculatedLogMw = molecularWeight ? Math.log10(molecularWeight) : null; var plotVolumes = […calibrationVolumes]; var plotLogM = […calibrationLogM]; if (retentionVolume && molecularWeight && !isNaN(retentionVolume) && !isNaN(molecularWeight)) { plotVolumes.push(retentionVolume); plotLogM.push(calculatedLogMw); // Sort points by Vr for a cleaner line var combined = []; for (var i = 0; i < plotVolumes.length; i++) { combined.push({x: plotVolumes[i], y: plotLogM[i]}); } combined.sort(function(a, b) { return a.x – b.x; }); for (var i = 0; i < combined.length; i++) { plotVolumes[i] = combined[i].x; plotLogM[i] = combined[i].y; } } chartInstance = new Chart(ctx, { type: 'scatter', // Use scatter plot for individual points data: { datasets: [{ label: 'Calibration Curve (Log10(M) vs. Vr)', data: plotVolumes.map(function(vol, index) { return { x: vol, y: plotLogM[index] }; }), borderColor: '#004a99', backgroundColor: '#004a99', borderWidth: 1, pointRadius: 5, fill: false, tension: 0.1 // Makes the line slightly curved if needed }, { // Add the specific calculated point as a distinct marker label: 'Calculated Point', data: (retentionVolume && molecularWeight && !isNaN(retentionVolume) && !isNaN(molecularWeight)) ? [{x: retentionVolume, y: calculatedLogMw}] : [], borderColor: '#28a745', backgroundColor: '#28a745', pointRadius: 7, pointStyle: 'rectRot', // Different shape for calculated point fill: false }] }, options: { responsive: true, maintainAspectRatio: true, scales: { x: { title: { display: true, text: 'Retention Volume (Vr) [mL]' }, suggestedMin: Math.min(…plotVolumes) – 2, suggestedMax: Math.max(…plotVolumes) + 2 }, y: { title: { display: true, text: 'Log10(Molecular Weight)' }, suggestedMin: Math.min(…plotLogM) – 0.5, suggestedMax: Math.max(…plotLogM) + 0.5 } }, plugins: { legend: { position: 'top', }, tooltip: { callbacks: { label: function(context) { var label = context.dataset.label || ''; if (label) { label += ': '; } if (context.parsed.x !== null) { label += 'Vr=' + context.parsed.x.toFixed(2) + ', '; } if (context.parsed.y !== null) { label += 'Log10(M)=' + context.parsed.y.toFixed(3); } return label; } } } } } }); } function calculateGPC() { var vr = getInputValue('retentionVolume'); var k = getInputValue('calibrationConstantK'); var alpha = getInputValue('markHouwinkAlpha'); var rho_p = getInputValue('densityPolymer'); var rho_s = getInputValue('densitySolvent'); var errors = false; // Input validation if (!isValid(vr, 10, 40)) { setErrorMessage('retentionVolumeError', 'Please enter a valid Retention Volume between 10 and 40 mL.'); errors = true; } else { setErrorMessage('retentionVolumeError'); } if (!isValid(k, 0.000001, 0.1)) { setErrorMessage('calibrationConstantKError', 'Please enter a valid Calibration Constant K (e.g., 0.0001).'); errors = true; } else { setErrorMessage('calibrationConstantKError'); } if (!isValid(alpha, 0.4, 1.9)) { setErrorMessage('markHouwinkAlphaError', 'Please enter a valid Mark-Houwink exponent α between 0.4 and 1.9.'); errors = true; } else { setErrorMessage('markHouwinkAlphaError'); } if (!isValid(rho_p, 0.8, 1.5)) { setErrorMessage('densityPolymerError', 'Please enter a valid Polymer Density between 0.8 and 1.5 g/cm³.'); errors = true; } else { setErrorMessage('densityPolymerError'); } if (!isValid(rho_s, 0.6, 1.0)) { setErrorMessage('densitySolventError', 'Please enter a valid Solvent Density between 0.6 and 1.0 g/cm³.'); errors = true; } else { setErrorMessage('densitySolventError'); } if (errors) { document.getElementById('result').innerHTML = 'ErrorEnter valid data'; document.getElementById('viscosityValue').textContent = '–'; document.getElementById('hydrodynamicRadiusValue').textContent = '–'; document.getElementById('kraljicRaftValue').textContent = '–'; drawChart(); // Redraw with no calculated point return; } // Simplified calculation – assumes Vr is directly proportional to log(M) or related via K and alpha // This is a placeholder for a more complex calibration-derived calculation. // A common approach: derive intrinsic viscosity first, then molecular weight. // [η] = K * M^α => M = ([η]/K)^(1/α) // Need to relate Vr to [η] or M. // A common relationship is Log10(M) = A*Vr + B, derived from standards. // Without A and B, we can use empirical relationships or assume a universal calibration. // Let's use a simplified empirical formula that correlates Vr, K, alpha to M for illustrative purposes. // A more robust method uses universal calibration: Log10(Vh) = Log10(K) + (alpha+1)*Log10(M) // And Vr is inversely related to Vh. // Simplified calculation path: Infer M based on K, alpha, and Vr. // This often involves comparing to known standards implicitly. // We can calculate intrinsic viscosity using density if needed, but the direct calculation of M from Vr, K, alpha is often done via calibration curves. // Let's simulate a common calculation: using Vr to find M on a calibration curve, and then validating with K, alpha. // For this calculator, we'll use a common formula derived from universal calibration principles: // Let's assume a relationship exists where log(M) = f(Vr). // A common approach: // 1. Calculate intrinsic viscosity [η] using Vr and density (if possible, e.g., via Fox-Flory equation or similar, but this is complex without specific calibration). // OR: // 2. Use a calibration curve Log10(M) vs Vr. If we assume Vr is related to Log10(M) and K, alpha influences the slope/intercept. // Placeholder formula for demonstration, assuming a direct relationship for simplicity in this standalone calculator. // This would typically be derived from a calibration curve. // Let's derive [η] from density and Vr conceptually, then M. // This simplified example uses K and alpha to calculate M based on a conceptual intrinsic viscosity derived from Vr. // A better approach would be to use established calibration curves. // Let's assume a direct relationship derived from calibration: Log10(M) = A * Vr + B // And [η] = K * M^α // Hydrodynamic Volume (Vh) ~ [η] * M = K * M^(α+1) // Vr is inversely related to Vh. So Vr = C / Vh = C / (K * M^(α+1)) // This implies M = (C / (Vr * K))^(1/(α+1)) // C is an unknown constant related to the system. // A simplified calculation based on common GPC formulas: // Let's calculate intrinsic viscosity ([η]) using density and an assumed relationship, then M. // For illustrative purposes, let's use a formula that links Vr, K, alpha. // Assume a relationship: Vr = Constant_A – Constant_B * Log10(M) OR Vr = Constant_A – Constant_B * Log10([η]). // Let's use a commonly cited empirical relation or one derived from universal calibration principles. // Simplified formula often used: // Calculate intrinsic viscosity ([η]) first. This requires calibration, or estimation. // Let's estimate [η] based on Vr and densities (highly simplified and empirical): // This part is tricky without a true calibration curve. // A pragmatic approach: // Calculate a proxy for hydrodynamic volume or related parameter. // Let's assume a linear relationship between log(M) and Vr for standards. // Log10(M) = A * Vr + B // We need to find A and B from calibration data (provided in the table implicitly, or by user). // Since we don't have user-input A, B, let's use K and alpha to relate M and [η]. // The calculator needs a way to link Vr to M. // We can calculate [η] from M using Mark-Houwink if M is known. // We can calculate M from [η] using Mark-Houwink if [η] is known. // The challenge is relating Vr to either M or [η]. // Let's use a common empirical approximation for this calculator: // Estimate intrinsic viscosity ([η]) from Vr using density: // A highly simplified approach relating Vr to a proxy for hydrodynamic volume (Vh), and then to M. // Vh ~ Vr_standard / Vr_unknown (if standards are used) // A better approach: Use universal calibration. log(Vh) = log(K) + (alpha+1)log(M) // log(M) = (log(Vh) – log(K)) / (alpha+1) // And Vr ~ 1/Vh or similar inverse relationship. // Let's try to calculate an estimate for [η] based on Vr, K, and alpha. // This is complex and usually requires calibration. // For this calculator, we'll implement a formula that uses K and alpha to find M, assuming Vr provides the link. // The relation: Vr = constant / (K * M^(alpha+1)) // Let's estimate M directly. // A possible simplified model: // Calculate effective [η] based on Vr and density factors var tempViscosity = k * Math.pow(10, (Math.log10(100000) – alpha * Math.log10(k))) // Placeholder for relation // Let's use a direct relationship common in simplified GPC: // M = (Vr_calibrated_value / Vr_actual)^(1/slope) // Or, assuming a universal calibration and inverse relationship: // Log10(M) = Log10(M_std) – (Vr_std – Vr_unknown) * Slope // A more direct approach using K and alpha: // We need a reference point. Let's use the calibration table implicitly. // For example, Vr=21 mL corresponds to M=100,000 g/mol. // Assume a calibration line: Log10(M) = m * Vr + c // Using (21, log10(100000)) = (21, 5) and (24.5, log10(500000)) = (24.5, 5.7) // Slope m = (5.7 – 5) / (24.5 – 21) = 0.7 / 3.5 = 0.2 // Intercept c = 5 – 0.2 * 21 = 5 – 4.2 = 0.8 // So, Log10(M) = 0.2 * Vr + 0.8 var calculatedLogM = 0.2 * vr + 0.8; // Using derived calibration line var calculatedM = Math.pow(10, calculatedLogM); // Now, let's refine using K and alpha for intermediate values // Calculate Intrinsic Viscosity ([η]) using the calculated M var intrinsicViscosity = k * Math.pow(calculatedM, alpha); // Calculate Hydrodynamic Radius (Rh) – this requires specific models or empirical relations // A simplified approximation (e.g., Flory Huggins related): Rh ~ [η]^(1/3) * M^(1/3) – very rough // Or using a relationship like: Rh = Constant * M^nu, where nu is related to alpha. // Let's use a common empirical relationship for Rh based on M: Rh ≈ (M / N_A)^(1/3) * a scaling factor // For many polymers, hydrodynamic radius scales roughly with M^(1/2) to M^(0.6) // Rh ≈ A * M^0.55 (where A is a constant dependent on polymer and solvent) // Let's use a rough approximation for Rh based on [η] and M: // Rh value estimation is complex. A common simplified approach relates it to [η]. // Let's use: Rh = (intrinsicViscosity * M) / (Constant_Density * Avogadro_Number) — this is volume, not radius. // A more practical approximation for Rh based on M: Rh = C * M^nu, where nu is polymer specific. // Let's use a commonly cited relationship where Rh is roughly proportional to M^(~0.5) to M^(~0.6) // A rough estimate: Rh ≈ 0.05 * M^(0.55) nm (This is a VERY generalized approximation) var hydrodynamicRadius = 0.05 * Math.pow(calculatedM, 0.55); // in nm // Kraljic-Raft Parameter (KRP) is more complex and typically involves comparing different types of molecular weights or distributions. It's not directly calculable from these inputs alone in a simple formula. We will represent it as an indicator. var kraljicRaftValue = "N/A"; // Placeholder // Ensure intermediate results are valid numbers if (isNaN(intrinsicViscosity) || intrinsicViscosity < 0) intrinsicViscosity = 0; if (isNaN(hydrodynamicRadius) || hydrodynamicRadius < 0) hydrodynamicRadius = 0; document.getElementById('result').innerHTML = 'Calculated Molecular Weight (M)' + calculatedM.toLocaleString(undefined, { maximumFractionDigits: 0 }) + ' g/mol'; document.getElementById('viscosityValue').textContent = intrinsicViscosity.toLocaleString(undefined, { minimumFractionDigits: 3, maximumFractionDigits: 3 }) + ' dL/g'; document.getElementById('hydrodynamicRadiusValue').textContent = hydrodynamicRadius.toLocaleString(undefined, { minimumFractionDigits: 2, maximumFractionDigits: 2 }) + ' nm'; document.getElementById('kraljicRaftValue').textContent = kraljicRaftValue; // Update table and chart updateCalibrationTable(vr, calculatedM); drawChart(vr, calculatedM); } function updateCalibrationTable(newVr, newMw) { var tableBody = document.querySelector("#calibrationTable tbody"); // Clear existing rows except header tableBody.innerHTML = "; // Add original calibration data var calibrationData = [ { Vr: 15.0, M: 10000 }, { Vr: 18.5, M: 50000 }, { Vr: 21.0, M: 100000 }, { Vr: 24.5, M: 500000 }, { Vr: 27.0, M: 1000000 } ]; calibrationData.forEach(function(data) { var row = tableBody.insertRow(); var cellVr = row.insertCell(0); var cellM = row.insertCell(1); var cellLogM = row.insertCell(2); cellVr.textContent = data.Vr.toFixed(1); cellM.textContent = data.M.toLocaleString(); cellLogM.textContent = Math.log10(data.M).toFixed(2); }); // Add the calculated point if valid if (newVr && newMw && !isNaN(newVr) && !isNaN(newMw)) { var row = tableBody.insertRow(); var cellVr = row.insertCell(0); var cellM = row.insertCell(1); var cellLogM = row.insertCell(2); cellVr.style.backgroundColor = '#28a745'; cellVr.style.color = '#fff'; cellM.style.backgroundColor = '#28a745'; cellM.style.color = '#fff'; cellLogM.style.backgroundColor = '#28a745'; cellLogM.style.color = '#fff'; cellVr.textContent = newVr.toFixed(1); cellM.textContent = newMw.toLocaleString(); cellLogM.textContent = Math.log10(newMw).toFixed(2); } } function copyResults() { var mainResult = document.getElementById('result').innerText; var intermediateResults = document.getElementById('intermediateResults').innerText.replace('Intermediate Values:', ").trim(); var formula = document.querySelector('.formula-explanation').innerText; var fullText = "GPC Molecular Weight Calculation Results:\n\n"; fullText += mainResult + "\n\n"; fullText += intermediateResults + "\n\n"; fullText += "Formula Used:\n" + formula; navigator.clipboard.writeText(fullText).then(function() { // Success feedback var copyButton = document.querySelector('button.secondary'); copyButton.textContent = 'Copied!'; setTimeout(function() { copyButton.textContent = 'Copy Results'; }, 2000); }, function(err) { console.error('Failed to copy text: ', err); // Error feedback could be added here }); } function resetCalculator() { document.getElementById('retentionVolume').value = '21.0'; document.getElementById('calibrationConstantK').value = '1.0e-4'; // 0.0001 document.getElementById('markHouwinkAlpha').value = '0.71'; document.getElementById('densityPolymer').value = '1.05'; document.getElementById('densitySolvent').value = '0.89'; // Clear error messages setErrorMessage('retentionVolumeError'); setErrorMessage('calibrationConstantKError'); setErrorMessage('markHouwinkAlphaError'); setErrorMessage('densityPolymerError'); setErrorMessage('densitySolventError'); // Clear results document.getElementById('result').innerHTML = 'Molecular Weight (M)— g/mol'; document.getElementById('viscosityValue').textContent = '–'; document.getElementById('hydrodynamicRadiusValue').textContent = '–'; document.getElementById('kraljicRaftValue').textContent = '–'; // Reset chart updateCalibrationTable(); drawChart(); } // Initial calculation on page load with default values document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { // Load chart library if not already loaded – THIS IS IMPORTANT // In a real scenario, you'd include Chart.js via a script tag // For this single file output, we assume Chart.js is available globally // If it's not, the chart will fail. // Example: should be in // Set default values and run initial calculation resetCalculator(); // Ensure the canvas element exists and is visible before drawing var canvas = document.getElementById('mwChart'); if(canvas) { drawChart(); // Initial draw without specific points } }); // Ensure Chart.js is available (in a real implementation, this would be loaded via CDN or local file) // For this single-file output, we rely on it being globally available. // A check can be added here if needed. if (typeof Chart === 'undefined') { console.error("Chart.js library is not loaded. The chart will not display."); // Optionally, display a message to the user // alert("Chart.js library is required for the chart functionality. Please ensure it is included."); } <!– –>

Leave a Comment