Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator

by
Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator: Which is Right for You? body { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Tahoma, Geneva, Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; color: #333; background-color: #f8f9fa; margin: 0; padding: 0; } .container { max-width: 1000px; margin: 20px auto; padding: 20px; background-color: #ffffff; box-shadow: 0 0 10px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); border-radius: 8px; } header { background-color: #004a99; color: #ffffff; padding: 20px 0; text-align: center; border-radius: 8px 8px 0 0; margin-bottom: 20px; } header h1 { margin: 0; font-size: 2.5em; } .calculator-section { margin-bottom: 30px; padding: 20px; border: 1px solid #dee2e6; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } .calculator-section h2 { text-align: center; color: #004a99; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 20px; } .loan-calc-container { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 15px; } .input-group { flex: 1 1 200px; display: flex; flex-direction: column; } .input-group label { display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; } .input-group input, .input-group select { padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ced4da; border-radius: 4px; font-size: 1em; width: calc(100% – 20px); /* Adjust for padding */ } .input-group input:focus, .input-group select:focus { outline: none; border-color: #007bff; box-shadow: 0 0 0 0.2rem rgba(0, 123, 255, 0.25); } .helper-text { font-size: 0.85em; color: #6c757d; margin-top: 5px; } .error-message { color: #dc3545; font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 5px; height: 1.2em; /* Reserve space */ } .button-group { flex: 1 1 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 10px; margin-top: 20px; } .button-group button { padding: 10px 20px; border: none; border-radius: 4px; font-size: 1em; cursor: pointer; transition: background-color 0.3s ease; color: white; } .btn-calculate { background-color: #28a745; } .btn-calculate:hover { background-color: #218838; } .btn-reset { background-color: #ffc107; } .btn-reset:hover { background-color: #e0a800; } .btn-copy { background-color: #17a2b8; } .btn-copy:hover { background-color: #138496; } .results-container { flex: 1 1 100%; margin-top: 20px; padding: 15px; border: 1px solid #e0e0e0; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #f8f9fa; } .primary-result { font-size: 1.8em; font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; text-align: center; margin-bottom: 15px; padding: 10px; background-color: #e7f3ff; border-radius: 4px; } .intermediate-results { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 15px; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 15px; } .intermediate-item { text-align: center; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd; border-radius: 4px; background-color: #fff; } .intermediate-item h4 { margin: 0 0 5px 0; font-size: 1em; color: #555; } .intermediate-item p { margin: 0; font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; } .formula-explanation { font-size: 0.9em; color: #6c757d; text-align: center; margin-top: 10px; } .chart-container, .table-container { margin-top: 30px; padding: 20px; border: 1px solid #dee2e6; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } .chart-container h3, .table-container h3 { text-align: center; color: #004a99; margin-top: 0; } canvas { display: block; margin: 20px auto; max-width: 100%; height: auto !important; } table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin-top: 15px; } th, td { border: 1px solid #dee2e6; padding: 10px; text-align: left; } th { background-color: #004a99; color: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; } tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f2f2f2; } article { margin-top: 30px; padding: 20px; border: 1px solid #dee2e6; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } article h2, article h3 { color: #004a99; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 15px; } article h2:first-child { margin-top: 0; } article p { margin-bottom: 15px; } article ul, article ol { margin-bottom: 15px; padding-left: 25px; } article li { margin-bottom: 8px; } .faq-question { font-weight: bold; color: #004a99; margin-top: 15px; margin-bottom: 5px; } .faq-answer { margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 15px; } .variable-table table { margin-top: 10px; } .variable-table th, .variable-table td { padding: 8px; } .variable-table th { background-color: #007bff; } .internal-links-section { margin-top: 30px; padding: 20px; border: 1px solid #dee2e6; border-radius: 5px; background-color: #fdfdfd; } .internal-links-section h2 { text-align: center; color: #004a99; margin-top: 0; } .internal-links-section ul { list-style: none; padding: 0; } .internal-links-section li { margin-bottom: 10px; } .internal-links-section a { color: #004a99; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; } .internal-links-section a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } .internal-links-section p { font-size: 0.9em; color: #6c757d; margin-top: 5px; } @media (max-width: 600px) { .container { margin: 10px; padding: 15px; } header h1 { font-size: 1.8em; } .loan-calc-container { flex-direction: column; } .input-group { width: 100%; flex: none; } .button-group button { width: 100%; } .intermediate-results { flex-direction: column; align-items: center; } .intermediate-item { width: 80%; } }

Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator

Calculator: Key Feature Comparison

Low (Basic Operations) Medium (Algebra, Trig) High (Calculus, Stats, Graphing)
Select the typical complexity of tasks you perform.
No Yes
Do you need to visualize functions and data?
None Basic Scripts Advanced Custom Functions
Do you need to write custom programs or functions?
Small (Basic Display) Medium (Multi-line) Large (High-Resolution, Graphing)
Consider display clarity and space for graphs.
High (Budget-focused) Medium Low (Feature-focused)
How important is the price point?
Choose your calculator

Functionality Score

—

Usability Score

—

Cost-Effectiveness Score

—

Scores are weighted based on your selections to indicate suitability.

Feature Comparison Overview

Visual comparison of estimated scores based on your inputs.

Calculator Type Suitability

Calculator Type Typical Use Cases Score Range Recommendation
Scientific Calculator Basic math, algebra, trigonometry, pre-calculus. Standardized tests. — —
Graphing Calculator Calculus, statistics, advanced functions, data analysis, graphing, programming. College-level math/science. — —
Suitability based on your selected feature priorities.

What is a Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator?

What is a Scientific Calculator?

A scientific calculator is an electronic device designed for performing mathematical calculations beyond basic arithmetic. It typically includes functions for trigonometry (sine, cosine, tangent), logarithms, exponents, roots, and often basic statistical operations. Scientific calculators are essential tools for students in middle school, high school, and early college, as well as professionals in fields that require regular mathematical computation but not necessarily graphical representation or advanced programming. They offer a balance of functionality and affordability, making them a staple in academic settings.

Who should use it: Students studying pre-algebra, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and pre-calculus. Individuals in professions like accounting, engineering (for specific tasks), and general science where complex calculations are needed but visualization isn't paramount. It's also ideal for those taking standardized tests where advanced calculators might be prohibited.

Common misconceptions: Some believe scientific calculators are only for advanced math. In reality, they are fundamental tools that ease many calculations encountered even in introductory algebra. Another misconception is that they are overly expensive; many reliable scientific calculators are very affordable.

What is a Graphing Calculator?

A graphing calculator is a more advanced type of electronic calculator capable of displaying graphs of functions and equations, as well as performing complex calculations. Beyond the capabilities of a scientific calculator, graphing calculators often include features for calculus (derivatives, integrals), statistics (regression analysis, probability distributions), matrix operations, complex numbers, and advanced equation solving. A key differentiator is their larger, higher-resolution screen, which can display graphs, tables of values, and more information simultaneously. Many graphing calculators also support programming, allowing users to create custom applications and functions, significantly enhancing their versatility for advanced academic and professional tasks.

Who should use it: High school students taking calculus and advanced placement (AP) math and science courses, college students in engineering, physics, mathematics, statistics, and economics programs. Professionals in research, data analysis, and fields requiring complex modeling and visualization. It's also the standard for many higher-level standardized tests like the SAT Subject Tests (in Math Level 2) and AP exams.

Common misconceptions: A frequent misconception is that graphing calculators are solely for graphing. While graphing is a primary feature, their advanced computational power, statistical capabilities, and programmability make them powerful all-around tools for complex problem-solving. Another is that they are overly complicated; while they have more features, their interfaces are generally designed to be intuitive for their target audience.

Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator: Key Differences

The primary distinction between a graphing calculator vs scientific calculator lies in their display capabilities and advanced functions. Scientific calculators are designed for numerical computation, offering a wide array of mathematical functions but limited to displaying numerical results or simple equations. Graphing calculators, on the other hand, excel at visualizing mathematical concepts. They can plot functions, analyze data points, and display complex outputs on a multi-line, often pixel-based screen. This graphical capability, coupled with more advanced statistical, calculus, and programming features, positions graphing calculators as the more powerful, albeit typically more expensive and complex, option for higher-level mathematics and science.

Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator Feature Score Logic

This calculator uses a simplified scoring system to help you decide between a graphing calculator and a scientific calculator. The core idea is to quantify your needs against the capabilities and typical characteristics of each calculator type.

Variable Meaning Unit Typical Range
Complexity Level Your assessed need for advanced mathematical functions (algebra, trig, calculus, stats). Higher value means more complex needs. Score (1-10) 5-9
Graphing Functionality Needed? Whether visual representation of functions is a requirement. 1 for Yes, 0 for No. Binary (0/1) 0-1
Programmability Needs The extent to which you need to create custom programs or functions. Higher value indicates greater need. Score (0-2) 0-2
Screen Size Preference Your desire for a larger, higher-resolution screen, often indicative of graphing or advanced features. Higher value means greater preference. Score (1-5) 1-5
Cost Sensitivity How much price influences your decision. Higher value means you are more budget-conscious. Score (1-3) 1-3
Functionality Score Weighted sum of Complexity, Graphing, Programmability, and Screen Size. Measures how well a calculator *could* meet your needs. Score (0-23) Calculated
Usability Score Inverse weighting of Complexity and Programmability, adjusted by Screen Size. Measures ease of use vs. features. Score (0-15) Calculated
Cost-Effectiveness Score Calculated based on Functionality Score relative to Cost Sensitivity. Higher score indicates better value for features. Score (0-10) Calculated
Graphing Calculator Suitability Overall score derived from Functionality, Usability, and Cost-Effectiveness, typically favoring features. Score (0-100) Calculated
Scientific Calculator Suitability Overall score derived from Functionality, Usability, and Cost-Effectiveness, typically favoring simplicity and cost. Score (0-100) Calculated

Practical Examples (Real-World Use Cases)

Example 1: High School Student (Pre-Calculus & AP Calculus)

Scenario: Sarah is a high school junior taking Pre-Calculus and plans to enroll in AP Calculus AB next year. She needs a calculator that can handle complex algebraic manipulations, trigonometric functions, and prepare her for calculus concepts like limits and derivatives. She also anticipates needing to graph functions to understand their behavior.

Inputs:

  • Complexity Level: 8 (High for AP Calc readiness)
  • Graphing Functionality Needed?: Yes (1)
  • Programmability Needs: Basic Scripts (1) (e.g., for iterative calculations)
  • Screen Size Preference: Large (5) (for clear graphs and multi-line display)
  • Cost Sensitivity: Medium (2)

Calculated Results (Illustrative):

  • Functionality Score: 16
  • Usability Score: 9
  • Cost-Effectiveness Score: 7
  • Primary Recommendation: Graphing Calculator
  • Graphing Calculator Suitability: 85
  • Scientific Calculator Suitability: 40

Interpretation: Sarah's needs strongly lean towards a graphing calculator. The requirement for AP Calculus, graphing capabilities, and a larger screen significantly outweigh her medium cost sensitivity. A scientific calculator would likely be insufficient for her advanced coursework and future needs.

Example 2: College Student (General Education Math Requirements)

Scenario: Ben is a college freshman fulfilling general education requirements. He needs to take a Statistics course that involves calculating means, standard deviations, and possibly performing basic regression analysis. He doesn't anticipate needing to graph complex functions or program the calculator.

Inputs:

  • Complexity Level: 6 (Medium for Stats basics)
  • Graphing Functionality Needed?: No (0)
  • Programmability Needs: None (0)
  • Screen Size Preference: Medium (3) (multi-line display for stats output is helpful)
  • Cost Sensitivity: High (3)

Calculated Results (Illustrative):

  • Functionality Score: 9
  • Usability Score: 12
  • Cost-Effectiveness Score: 9
  • Primary Recommendation: Scientific Calculator
  • Graphing Calculator Suitability: 55
  • Scientific Calculator Suitability: 80

Interpretation: Ben's needs are best met by a scientific calculator. His focus on basic statistical functions, lack of need for graphing or programming, and high cost sensitivity make a scientific calculator the more appropriate and economical choice. While a graphing calculator *could* perform these tasks, it would be overkill and less cost-effective for his specific requirements.

How to Use This Graphing Calculator vs Scientific Calculator Tool

This tool is designed to provide a clear recommendation based on your specific needs and preferences when choosing between a graphing calculator vs scientific calculator.

  1. Assess Your Needs: Honestly evaluate the type of math and science courses you are taking or anticipate taking. Consider if visualizing functions (graphing) or programming custom solutions is necessary.
  2. Adjust Input Settings: Use the dropdown menus to select your requirements for:
    • Complexity Level: From basic algebra to advanced calculus and statistics.
    • Graphing Functionality: Whether you need to plot functions.
    • Programmability: If you need to write your own functions or scripts.
    • Screen Size Preference: For display clarity and viewing graphs/multiple lines.
    • Cost Sensitivity: How important budget is.
  3. Review Results: As you change the inputs, the calculator will instantly update:
    • Primary Recommendation: A clear indication of which type of calculator is likely best.
    • Intermediate Scores: Understand how Functionality, Usability, and Cost-Effectiveness contribute to the recommendation.
    • Suitability Scores: See a comparative score for both types.
    • Chart and Table: Visualize the comparison and understand suitability ranges.
  4. Make Your Decision: Use the recommendation and scores as a guide. Remember that while a graphing calculator is more powerful, a scientific calculator is often sufficient and more affordable for many academic levels.
  5. Reset and Re-evaluate: If your needs change or you want to explore different scenarios, click the 'Reset' button to return to default settings.

Decision-Making Guidance: If your primary need is visualizing functions, tackling calculus or advanced statistics, or programming, lean towards a graphing calculator. If your needs are primarily numerical computation for algebra, trigonometry, or basic statistics, and budget is a concern, a scientific calculator is likely the more practical choice.

Key Factors That Affect Calculator Choice

  1. Curriculum Requirements: The most critical factor. Many high school and college courses (especially in STEM fields) mandate specific types of calculators. Check your course syllabus or ask your instructor. A scientific calculator might be sufficient for some, while others will absolutely require a graphing model.
  2. Level of Mathematics: Basic algebra and trigonometry can be handled by scientific calculators. However, calculus, differential equations, linear algebra, and advanced statistics almost always necessitate the computational power and graphing capabilities of a graphing calculator.
  3. Need for Visualization: If understanding the shape of a function, analyzing data trends visually, or exploring mathematical relationships through graphs is important for your learning or work, a graphing calculator is indispensable.
  4. Programmability and Customization: For advanced users who need to automate complex calculations, create iterative sequences, or develop specific algorithms, the programming features of a graphing calculator are invaluable. This is less common for basic scientific calculator users.
  5. Standardized Test Policies: Different standardized tests have varying policies on calculator usage. Some allow only basic scientific calculators, while others permit graphing calculators. Ensure your choice complies with the rules of any tests you plan to take (e.g., SAT, ACT, AP Exams). Choosing the wrong one could hinder your performance or even disqualify your answers.
  6. Budget Constraints: Graphing calculators are typically significantly more expensive than scientific calculators due to their advanced hardware (larger screen, more memory, faster processor) and software capabilities. Your budget will be a practical determinant. A feature-rich graphing calculator can cost upwards of $100-$200, whereas a capable scientific calculator can be found for $15-$50.
  7. Ease of Use vs. Power: Scientific calculators often have a more straightforward interface for their core functions. Graphing calculators, with their extensive capabilities, can have a steeper learning curve. Consider how much time you are willing to invest in learning to use your calculator effectively.
  8. Longevity and Future Needs: If you anticipate progressing into higher-level mathematics or science courses, investing in a graphing calculator upfront might save money and hassle in the long run compared to upgrading from a scientific calculator later.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Can a scientific calculator do everything a graphing calculator can?
No. While a scientific calculator handles a vast range of numerical computations, it lacks the ability to display graphs of functions, perform advanced calculus operations numerically (like definite integrals), handle matrix operations efficiently, or typically support user programming in the same way a graphing calculator does.
Q2: Do I really need a graphing calculator for AP Calculus?
Yes, generally. AP Calculus exams and coursework are designed with the capabilities of graphing calculators in mind. They are crucial for visualizing functions, understanding derivatives and integrals in context, and performing statistical analyses often required in AP courses. Always check the specific requirements for your AP course and exam.
Q3: Are graphing calculators difficult to learn how to use?
They can have a steeper learning curve than scientific calculators due to their extensive features and menu-driven interfaces. However, most come with comprehensive manuals, and online tutorials are abundant. For the specific tasks they are designed for (like graphing and calculus), they become intuitive with practice.
Q4: Which calculator is better for standardized tests like the SAT?
The SAT permits most scientific and graphing calculators. However, calculators that can perform symbolic calculus operations (like differentiation or integration) are NOT allowed. Most standard scientific calculators and many graphing calculators (if used appropriately) are permitted. It's always best to check the latest College Board guidelines for the most up-to-date list of approved models and restrictions.
Q5: Can I use my smartphone or tablet calculator app instead?
For many standardized tests (like the SAT, ACT) and in many classrooms, smartphone apps are strictly prohibited. Dedicated calculators are required. While apps exist that mimic graphing calculators, they are often not allowed in testing environments.
Q6: How much more expensive is a graphing calculator typically?
A good scientific calculator can range from $15 to $50. A capable graphing calculator typically starts around $80-$100 and can go up to $200 or more for the latest models with advanced features.
Q7: If I only need basic algebra and trigonometry, is a scientific calculator enough?
Yes, absolutely. For standard high school algebra, geometry, and trigonometry, a scientific calculator provides all the necessary functions. Investing in a graphing calculator might be unnecessary and more costly if you don't anticipate needing its advanced features.
Q8: What are the benefits of programmability on a graphing calculator?
Programmability allows users to create custom functions, automate repetitive calculations, solve complex equations that aren't built-in, and even develop small applications. This is particularly useful for engineering students, researchers, or anyone needing to perform highly specific or repetitive computations efficiently.

Related Tools and Internal Resources

function updateCalculator() { var complexityLevel = parseFloat(document.getElementById("complexityLevel").value); var graphingFeatures = parseFloat(document.getElementById("graphingFeatures").value); var programmability = parseFloat(document.getElementById("programmability").value); var screenSize = parseFloat(document.getElementById("screenSize").value); var costSensitivity = parseFloat(document.getElementById("costSensitivity").value); var functionalityScore = 0; var usabilityScore = 0; var costEffectivenessScore = 0; // — Score Calculations — // Functionality: Higher complexity, graphing, programmability, larger screen = higher score functionalityScore = (complexityLevel * 1.5) + (graphingFeatures * 5) + (programmability * 3) + (screenSize * 1); // Usability: Lower complexity, lower programmability, smaller screen = higher score (easier to use) // Invert complexity and programmability, scale screen size usabilityScore = (10 – complexityLevel) * 1.2 + (2 – programmability) * 2 + (5 – screenSize) * 0.5; if (usabilityScore 15) usabilityScore = 15; // Cap usability score // Cost-Effectiveness: Functionality relative to cost sensitivity // Higher functionality and lower cost sensitivity = higher score var costFactor = (4 – costSensitivity); // Higher cost sensitivity means lower score costEffectivenessScore = (functionalityScore / 15) * costFactor * 5; // Normalize and scale if (costEffectivenessScore 10) costEffectivenessScore = 10; // Cap cost-effectiveness score // — Determine Primary Recommendation — var primaryRecommendation = "Scientific Calculator"; var graphScore = 0; var sciScore = 0; // Graphing Calculator suitability heavily weighted by graphingFeatures and complexity graphScore = (functionalityScore * 3) + (usabilityScore * 1) + (costEffectivenessScore * 1.5); // Scientific Calculator suitability weighted by lower complexity, higher usability, and cost-effectiveness sciScore = (functionalityScore * 1) + (usabilityScore * 3) + (costEffectivenessScore * 3); // Adjust scores based on primary drivers if (graphingFeatures > 0 || complexityLevel >= 8) { graphScore += 20; // Bonus for explicit graphing need or very high complexity } if (costSensitivity >= 3 && functionalityScore sciScore && graphScore > 60) { primaryRecommendation = "Graphing Calculator"; } else { primaryRecommendation = "Scientific Calculator"; } if (graphScore > 75 && sciScore > 75) { primaryRecommendation = "Either (Graphing Recommended)"; } else if (sciScore > 75 && graphScore > 75) { primaryRecommendation = "Either (Scientific Recommended)"; } else if (graphScore > sciScore) { primaryRecommendation = "Graphing Calculator"; } else { primaryRecommendation = "Scientific Calculator"; } // — Display Results — document.getElementById("primaryResult").innerText = primaryRecommendation; document.getElementById("functionalityScore").innerText = Math.round(functionalityScore); document.getElementById("usabilityScore").innerText = Math.round(usabilityScore); document.getElementById("costEffectivenessScore").innerText = Math.round(costEffectivenessScore); // Update suitability table document.getElementById("sciScoreRange").innerText = Math.round(sciScore) + "%"; document.getElementById("graphScoreRange").innerText = Math.round(graphScore) + "%"; var sciRec = "Recommended"; var graphRec = "Less Recommended"; if (sciScore > graphScore && sciScore > 60) { sciRec = "Highly Recommended"; graphRec = "Potentially Overkill"; } else if (graphScore > sciScore && graphScore > 60) { graphRec = "Highly Recommended"; sciRec = "Likely Insufficient"; } else if (sciScore > 70) { sciRec = "Recommended"; graphRec = "Likely Unnecessary"; } else if (graphScore > 70) { graphRec = "Recommended"; sciRec = "Potentially Limited"; } else { sciRec = "Consider"; graphRec = "Consider"; } document.getElementById("sciRecommendation").innerText = sciRec; document.getElementById("graphRecommendation").innerText = graphRec; // — Update Chart — updateChart(graphScore, sciScore); } function resetCalculator() { document.getElementById("complexityLevel").value = 7; document.getElementById("graphingFeatures").value = 1; document.getElementById("programmability").value = 1; document.getElementById("screenSize").value = 3; document.getElementById("costSensitivity").value = 2; updateCalculator(); } function copyResults() { var primaryResult = document.getElementById("primaryResult").innerText; var functionality = document.getElementById("functionalityScore").innerText; var usability = document.getElementById("usabilityScore").innerText; var costEffectiveness = document.getElementById("costEffectivenessScore").innerText; var sciScore = document.getElementById("sciScoreRange").innerText; var graphScore = document.getElementById("graphScoreRange").innerText; var sciRec = document.getElementById("sciRecommendation").innerText; var graphRec = document.getElementById("graphRecommendation").innerText; var assumptions = "Assumptions:\n"; assumptions += "- Complexity Level: " + document.getElementById("complexityLevel").options[document.getElementById("complexityLevel").selectedIndex].text + "\n"; assumptions += "- Graphing Functionality Needed: " + document.getElementById("graphingFeatures").options[document.getElementById("graphingFeatures").selectedIndex].text + "\n"; assumptions += "- Programmability Needs: " + document.getElementById("programmability").options[document.getElementById("programmability").selectedIndex].text + "\n"; assumptions += "- Screen Size Preference: " + document.getElementById("screenSize").options[document.getElementById("screenSize").selectedIndex].text + "\n"; assumptions += "- Cost Sensitivity: " + document.getElementById("costSensitivity").options[document.getElementById("costSensitivity").selectedIndex].text + "\n"; var resultText = "Calculator Recommendation:\n"; resultText += "Primary: " + primaryResult + "\n\n"; resultText += "Scores:\n"; resultText += "- Functionality: " + functionality + "\n"; resultText += "- Usability: " + usability + "\n"; resultText += "- Cost-Effectiveness: " + costEffectiveness + "\n\n"; resultText += "Suitability:\n"; resultText += "- Scientific Calculator: " + sciScore + " (" + sciRec + ")\n"; resultText += "- Graphing Calculator: " + graphScore + " (" + graphRec + ")\n\n"; resultText += assumptions; try { navigator.clipboard.writeText(resultText).then(function() { alert("Results copied to clipboard!"); }, function(err) { console.error('Async: Could not copy text: ', err); // Fallback for older browsers or environments without clipboard access var textArea = document.createElement("textarea"); textArea.value = resultText; textArea.style.position = "fixed"; textArea.style.left = "-9999px"; document.body.appendChild(textArea); textArea.focus(); textArea.select(); try { var successful = document.execCommand('copy'); var msg = successful ? 'successful' : 'unsuccessful'; console.log('Fallback: Copying text command was ' + msg); alert("Results copied to clipboard!"); } catch (err) { console.error('Fallback: Oops, unable to copy', err); alert("Failed to copy results."); } document.body.removeChild(textArea); }); } catch (e) { console.error('Clipboard API not available or failed: ', e); alert("Clipboard API not available. Please copy manually."); } } // Charting Logic var myChart; // Declare chart variable globally function updateChart(graphScore, sciScore) { var ctx = document.getElementById('calculatorChart').getContext('2d'); // Destroy previous chart instance if it exists if (myChart) { myChart.destroy(); } var chartLabels = ['Scientific Calculator', 'Graphing Calculator']; var chartData = [sciScore, graphScore]; var barColors = ['#17a2b8', '#004a99']; // Scientific (Teal), Graphing (Blue) myChart = new Chart(ctx, { type: 'bar', data: { labels: chartLabels, datasets: [{ label: 'Suitability Score (%)', data: chartData, backgroundColor: barColors, borderColor: '#ffffff', borderWidth: 1 }] }, options: { responsive: true, maintainAspectRatio: false, scales: { y: { beginAtZero: true, max: 100, ticks: { color: '#333' }, grid: { color: 'rgba(200, 200, 200, 0.2)' } }, x: { ticks: { color: '#333' }, grid: { display: false } } }, plugins: { legend: { display: false // Hiding legend as labels are on X-axis }, title: { display: true, text: 'Calculator Suitability Score Comparison', color: '#004a99', font: { size: 16 } } } } }); } // Initial calculation and chart render on page load document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { updateCalculator(); // Initial chart data needs to be set – calling updateCalculator() does this });

Leave a Comment